Opening of SB Accounts and Guide lines on Out sourcing- CO orders

Opening of SB Accounts and Guide lines on Out sourcing- CO orders

Filling up of various posts in the National Commission for Protection of Child Rights, New Delhi through deputation on Foreign Service Terms — regarding

Filling up of various posts in the National Commission for Protection of Child Rights, New Delhi through deputation on Foreign Service Terms — regarding

F.No.21/1/2012-CS-I(D)

Government of India

Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions

(Department of Personnel and Training)

2nd Floor, Lok Nayak Bhavan, New Delhi-1'10003

Dated the 6th November, 2013

OFFICE MEMORANDUM

Subject: Filling up of various posts in the National Commission for Protection of Child Rights, New Delhi through deputation on Foreign Service Terms — regarding,

National Commission for Protection of Child Rights(NCPCR), New Delhi a Statutory Body under the Ministry of Women & Child Development requires to fill up various posts in the Commission through deputation on "Foreign Service Terms" for which they have invited applications from officers who desire to work on deputation basis. The vacancy circular issued by the NCPCR is annexed.

2. All Ministries/Departments are requested to give wide publicity to the above vacancy among their employees and may forward the applications, if any, to the Member Secretary, National Commission for Protection of Child Rights, 5th floor  Chanderlok Building, 36, Janpath, New Delhi- 110001 latest by 30-11-2013.

3. Cadre Clearance in respect of Officers of CSS/CSSS of the grades of US/PPS and above may be obtained from DOP&T (CS-I & CS-II Divisions).

Under Secretary to the Government of India

24629413

Read more-http://ccis.nic.in/WriteReadData/CircularPortal/D2/D02csd/VacNCPCR.pdf

SC to decide whether gratuity can be withheld

New Delhi, Nov 6 (PTI) The Supreme Court will lay down the law on whether an employer can withhold gratuity of an employee after retirement if a departmental proceeding is pending against him, saying there is no authoritative judgement on the issue.

The court referred the issue to a three-judge bench which will also decide whether an employee, who has retired, can be penalised with retrospective termination of service which is a condition for forfeiture of gratuity.

Employee can't escape recovery of excess payments: SC

New Delhi, Nov 2 (IANS): The Supreme Court has said that even after retirement from service, an employee can't escape the recovery of the excess amount that is credited due to an error in salary calculations.

Rejecting the submission that no amount should be recovered from the excess salary paid to employees, the apex court bench of Justice Anil R. Dave and Justice Dipak Misra said, "...if any amount had been paid due to mistake, the mistake must be rectified and the amount so paid in pursuance of the mistake must be recovered".

"It might also happen that the employer might have to pay some amount to the respondent as a result of some mistake and in such an event, even the appellant (employer) might have to pay to the respondent (employee)," said Justice Dave in the judgment pronounced Friday.

"Be that as it may, upon settlement of the account, whatever amount has to be paid to the respondent employee or to the appellant employer shall be paid and the account shall be adjusted accordingly", the court said setting aside a Punjab and Haryana High Court order.

The apex court said this while allowing an appeal by Chandigarh administration challenging the March 20, 2008 decision of Punjab and Haryana High Court by which it had allowed the plea of Gurcharan Singh against the recovery of excess of money that was paid to him due to erroneous fixation of his salary by the Chandigarh Transport Undertaking where he had worked as a clerk.

Gurcharan Singh had moved the High Court after his plea against the recovery of excess money was junked by the Central Administrative Tribunal Jan 4,2002.

Singh, who had served as Combatant Clerk, was discharged from the army Jan 31,1990. He got employed with Chandigarh Transport Undertaking April 15, 1990 against ex-servicemen quota.

Two years later, he got his pay that was fixed by an order of Sep 2,1992. Upon his retirement, it emerged during an audit that his pay was wrongly fixed by the communication of Sep 2.

On retrospective re-fixation of his salary, it emerged that he was paid excess payment and same were sought to be recovered.

Source: http://www.daijiworld.com/news/news_disp.asp?n_id=199032