No plan to increase Central Govt Employees’ Retirement age: Zee News
A hot news is coming from Zee News that DoPT has not been working on any proposal to increase the retirement age to 62 from 60 years for Central Government Employees. A senior official from DoPT has confirmed the above news to media and also clarified that a committee has been formed for increase the retirement age of specialists in scientific and medical fields (scientists) to 64 years. Last updates from parliament question session is also indicating that there is no proposal under consideration in this regard.
The news article of Zee News, which is showing updation time of 13.28 of 16th June, it means it is very latest news in this regard, the text of the said news is reproduced below:-
New Delhi: Central government employees are in for a disappointment as the Centre is at present not considering any move to raise the retirement age to 62 years.
A senior official in the Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions, which acts as nodal department for personnel matters, said there was no such proposal to increase the age for superannuation of government employees.
"There is no proposal to increase the retirement age to 62 from 60 years. The Ministry is not working on any such proposal," the official said.
Recent media reports claimed that the Ministry has written to Prime Minister's Office for raising the retirement age and sought the Union Cabinet's nod for the purpose.
There are about 50 lakh central government employees working in various departments across the country.
Officials in the Ministry said increasing retirement age requires a detailed consultation with all stake holders and discussion with the Finance Ministry.
Without the Finance Ministry's permission, the matter cannot not be processed, they said.
At a time when government is working on austerity drive by cutting expenditure and putting in efforts to rein in current account deficit (CAD), the move to increase retirement age will also burden the exchequer's kitty, they said.
The CAD, which is the difference between the inflow and outflow of foreign currency, had touched a record high of 6.7 per cent in the October-December quarter of 2012-13 on the back of rising oil and gold imports.
The retirement age for a majority of central government employees is 60 years. However, the age for retirement in case of teachers and scientists is 62 years.
The age of superannuation in states like Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh and Assam is also 60 years.
In a related development, the government has decided to further increase the retirement age of specialists in scientific and medical fields (scientists) to 64 years.
"A Committee has been formed under the chairmanship of Cabinet Secretary by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh for the purpose," said another Personnel Ministry official.
read more at Zee News
No plan to increase retirement age of employees"- PTI Report
"No plan to increase retirement age of employees"- PTI Report
New Delhi, Jun 16 (PTI) Central government employees are in for a disappointment as the Centre is at present not considering any move to raise the retirement age to 62 years.
A senior official in the Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions, which acts as nodal department for personnel matters, said there was no such proposal to increase the age for superannuation of government employees.
"There is no proposal to increase the retirement age to 62 from 60 years".
Source: PTI News
[http://www.ptinews.com/news/3724917_-No-plan-to-increase-retirement-age-of-employees-]
New Delhi, Jun 16 (PTI) Central government employees are in for a disappointment as the Centre is at present not considering any move to raise the retirement age to 62 years.
A senior official in the Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions, which acts as nodal department for personnel matters, said there was no such proposal to increase the age for superannuation of government employees.
"There is no proposal to increase the retirement age to 62 from 60 years".
Source: PTI News
[http://www.ptinews.com/news/3724917_-No-plan-to-increase-retirement-age-of-employees-]
The world of the Telegram
When the doorbell rang in the middle of the night, the 'who could it be at this hour' question ran through everyone's mind. If the voice on the other side of the door said 'telegram' then the curiosity intensified into an electric form of anxiety that raced through the house bringing everyone within earshot to the door. One signed for the sealed envelope, ripped it open and read out the contents, all hearts clogging up one mouth. Sometimes the news was exactly of the kind that made telegrams so feared while on other occasions, telegram said something to the effect of 'Arriving 17th instant Rajdhani with family. Book return 6th May." Of course, one had the more harmless greetings telegrams (number 5 Many Happy Returns of the Day) but those were unlikely to be delivered in the dead of night. By virtue of their speed and stealth, telegrams were messengers of fate, letter bombs that interrupted the placid predictability of life with some sudden and significant new development.
For a technology that now seems rudimentary at best, the telegraph was in fact a truly radical and discontinuous innovation that marked the beginning of the Information Age. Noam Chomsky argues that the shift from sailing ship to telegraph was more radical than from the telephone to the e-mail and it is easy to see why. The telegraph made it possible not only to compress meaning into some rudimentary sound signals that could be sent and received over vast distances but do so wirelessly and in real time. The Morse code allowed the telegraph to move beyond more basic signals into the fullness of language and radio technology freed it from wires. The collapsing of distance that we see as a fundamental attribute of technology today was first made evident in the telegraph which made it possible for different parts of the world to have the same experience at the same time. The ability to unite the world around a moment is a powerful experience that makes our parallel existences palpably simultaneous.
At a time when other modes of communication were unreliable, inaccessible and slow, the telegram was the final recourse available when a message just had to be delivered with a guarantee. In its manner of use, respect for its importance was usually maintained; the telegram was never just another way of reaching someone. The expensiveness of the telegram meant that for most normal people, language would need to rid itself of its finery and communicate in guttural droppings of meaning. Articles, prepositions, conjunctions, were among the casualties of this mode of communication, as words huddled together without the relief of semantic cushions to create hard bits of meaning. Other modes of reaching were far more adept at more leisurely interactions. The telegram delivered the promise of technology without any of its gloss, it murdered distance, but did so without any great finesse. There was clearly a trade-off to be made between speed and the richness of communication which is why the telegram worked best when it was conveying a piece of news with some finality- someone passed the exam, someone else passed away, a trip date got postponed.
In some ways, the telegram in the laconic abruptness of its form, emphasised the fact that the dominant meaning of communication at that time was very different. In that world, relationships were lavished with time, attention and conversation. Postcards and inland letters were deemed to be wasted if every inch on its sides were not filled up with crawling postscripts of sundry kinds. Distance made the urge to stay connected that much deeper, and the fact that typically no message could be exchanged in a time period less than a fortnight at the least, given the slowness of the postal system, meant that we derived disproportionate communication from relatively infrequent contact. Vacations became a time when relationships were tanked up with a couple of months' worth of interaction, which was lived off for the rest of the year, topped up by periodic postcards and letters, which were read aloud and then re-read several times. A trunk call was rare- the difficulty of getting through (particularly because often, it involving one party calling from a Post Office and the other using the neighbour's phone) and the cost involved pretty much ensured that. In any case, when the need was to urgently communicate some bit of information, nothing could beat the telegram.
Unlike the idea of always being connected that has become the norm today- everyone meaningful is either on social media or a text message away- we lived a life only partially illuminated with knowledge. At any given point in time, there were so many aspects of our own life that we had no access to. When someone went abroad, for instance, for long periods of time, one's loved ones had no idea as to what was happening. Any meaningful form of communication was slow, so slow that by the time one received and replied, things could have changed dramatically. Relationships found a way of thriving in this constrained world by substituting imagination and yearning in the place of actual contact. The telegram was a way of ensuring that if it came to the crunch, virtually instant communication was always possible. Armed with this lifeline, the idea of connectivity focused on richness rather than frequency. Every physical contact was heightened by the anticipation that preceded it and the wallowing in memories that followed it. By itself, the telegram is hardly a great loss, but it does also tell us that the world that depended on it has also changed in a fundamental way. That we don't need the telegram any more is a clue to the fact that we are connected all the time, but it may also point out that being connected is not the same as feeling a connection.
For a technology that now seems rudimentary at best, the telegraph was in fact a truly radical and discontinuous innovation that marked the beginning of the Information Age. Noam Chomsky argues that the shift from sailing ship to telegraph was more radical than from the telephone to the e-mail and it is easy to see why. The telegraph made it possible not only to compress meaning into some rudimentary sound signals that could be sent and received over vast distances but do so wirelessly and in real time. The Morse code allowed the telegraph to move beyond more basic signals into the fullness of language and radio technology freed it from wires. The collapsing of distance that we see as a fundamental attribute of technology today was first made evident in the telegraph which made it possible for different parts of the world to have the same experience at the same time. The ability to unite the world around a moment is a powerful experience that makes our parallel existences palpably simultaneous.
At a time when other modes of communication were unreliable, inaccessible and slow, the telegram was the final recourse available when a message just had to be delivered with a guarantee. In its manner of use, respect for its importance was usually maintained; the telegram was never just another way of reaching someone. The expensiveness of the telegram meant that for most normal people, language would need to rid itself of its finery and communicate in guttural droppings of meaning. Articles, prepositions, conjunctions, were among the casualties of this mode of communication, as words huddled together without the relief of semantic cushions to create hard bits of meaning. Other modes of reaching were far more adept at more leisurely interactions. The telegram delivered the promise of technology without any of its gloss, it murdered distance, but did so without any great finesse. There was clearly a trade-off to be made between speed and the richness of communication which is why the telegram worked best when it was conveying a piece of news with some finality- someone passed the exam, someone else passed away, a trip date got postponed.
In some ways, the telegram in the laconic abruptness of its form, emphasised the fact that the dominant meaning of communication at that time was very different. In that world, relationships were lavished with time, attention and conversation. Postcards and inland letters were deemed to be wasted if every inch on its sides were not filled up with crawling postscripts of sundry kinds. Distance made the urge to stay connected that much deeper, and the fact that typically no message could be exchanged in a time period less than a fortnight at the least, given the slowness of the postal system, meant that we derived disproportionate communication from relatively infrequent contact. Vacations became a time when relationships were tanked up with a couple of months' worth of interaction, which was lived off for the rest of the year, topped up by periodic postcards and letters, which were read aloud and then re-read several times. A trunk call was rare- the difficulty of getting through (particularly because often, it involving one party calling from a Post Office and the other using the neighbour's phone) and the cost involved pretty much ensured that. In any case, when the need was to urgently communicate some bit of information, nothing could beat the telegram.
Unlike the idea of always being connected that has become the norm today- everyone meaningful is either on social media or a text message away- we lived a life only partially illuminated with knowledge. At any given point in time, there were so many aspects of our own life that we had no access to. When someone went abroad, for instance, for long periods of time, one's loved ones had no idea as to what was happening. Any meaningful form of communication was slow, so slow that by the time one received and replied, things could have changed dramatically. Relationships found a way of thriving in this constrained world by substituting imagination and yearning in the place of actual contact. The telegram was a way of ensuring that if it came to the crunch, virtually instant communication was always possible. Armed with this lifeline, the idea of connectivity focused on richness rather than frequency. Every physical contact was heightened by the anticipation that preceded it and the wallowing in memories that followed it. By itself, the telegram is hardly a great loss, but it does also tell us that the world that depended on it has also changed in a fundamental way. That we don't need the telegram any more is a clue to the fact that we are connected all the time, but it may also point out that being connected is not the same as feeling a connection.
Source:-The Times of India
HOMAGE TO COM. ADINARAYANA
Minutes of the meeting held on 28.5.2013 with the representatives of Staff Side, National Council (JCM) on pensionary matters - AIRF
F. No. 42/7/2013-P&PW(G)
Government of India
Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances & Pensions
Department of Pension & Pensioners’ Welfare
3rd Floor, Lok Nayak Bhavan,
Khan Market, New Delhi - 110003
Dated : 12th June, 2013
OFFICE MEMORANDUM
Subject: Minutes of the meeting held on 28.5.2013 with the representatives of Staff Side, National Council (JCM) on pensionary matters.
The undersigned is directed to enclose herewith a copy of minutes of the meeting held on 28.5.2013 with the representatives of the Staff Side, National Council (JCM) on pensionary matters under the Chairmanship of Secretary (Pension, AR&PG) in room No. 310, Lok Nayak Bhawan, Khan Market, New Delhi for information/necessary action.
sd/-
(Sujasha Choudhury)
Dy. Secretary (P)
DEPARTMENT OF PENSION & PENSIONERS’ WELFARE
MINUTES OF THE MEETING WITH THE REPRESENTATIVES OF STAFF SIDE, NATIONAL COUNCIL (JCM) ON PENSIONARY MATTERS UNDER THE CHAIRMANSHIP OF SECRETARY (PENSION, AR&PG) ON 28.5.2013 AT LOK NAYAK BHAWAN, NEW DELHI
Secretary (Pension, AR&PG) chaired a meeting with the representatives of Staff Side, National Council (JCM) on 28.5.2013 to discuss various issues relating to pension and other retirement benefits. The list of participants is at Annexure - I. Secretary (Pension, AR&PG) welcomed the participants and appreciated the contributions of the pensioners in the overall development of their respective organisation.
2. The meeting started with a discussion on the Action Taken Report on the minutes of the meeting held on 6.11.2012 as per details given below :
(i) Ex-gratia payment to SRPF/CPF beneficiaries who retired other than on superannuation, i.e. voluntary retirement and medical invalidation cases.
Department of Expenditure has given clearance for deletion of clause of 'c' of para 2 of OM dated 22.3.2004 which prohibits grant of ex-gratia payment to those, who retired from service other than on attaining the prescribed age of superannuation. With this, CPF beneficiaries who have retired voluntarily and on medical grounds after 20 years of service will also be granted ex-gratia. It was decided that this agenda item will be closed after issue of a revised OM by the DOP&PW. Ministry of Railways will also issue similar orders.
Action DOP&PW and Ministry of Railways
(ii) Raising quantum of ex-gratia to CPF retirees on the lines of SRPF.
The latest status of the case was intimated to the JCM. After the issue of orders by this Department, consequent to the decision of Cabinet the item may be dropped.
Action : DOP&PW
(iii) Abnormal delay in the issue of revised PPO to Pre - 2006 retirees, pensioners / family pensioners.
(i) It was intimated that the Department had taken the following initiatives like (a) allowing change in date of birth of spouse, (b) use of certain documents as proof of date of birth of spouse, (c) inclusion of present postal address and mobile and telephone number in the life certificate (d) use of e-scroll for extracting information from banks’ database. (e) revision of PPOs even in cases where date of birth/age of spouse is not given in the PPO or this information is not available In the omce records for speedy revision of PPOs.
(ii) As a result, the number of pending revision cases for civil pensioners has come down from 2,54,467 in August, 2012 to 74,000 as on April, 2013 as per information given by the CPAO on the basis of e-scrolls.
(iii) However, amendment in calculation of revised pension, vIde OM dated 28.1.13, has necessitated issue of revised authority in all cases, as indicated in OM dated 13.2.13.
Secretary (Pension, AR&PG) stated that record/information of many pensioners are not available with the Departments, which is hampering further progress and the Pensioners Associations should come forward to help the departments in reaching out to the pensioners/family pensioners. He further stated that Secretaries of various Departments have been requested to review the issue of revision of PPO in the fortnightly/ monthly meetings.
Railways stated that in case of pre 2006 pensioners advertisement has been issued. Matter was taken up with RBI to issue notification to all banks. Out of 10.89 lakh such cases, 5.46 have been issued revised PPOs. Meetings ere generally held at various levels. 30th September, 2013 has been set as the target date for disposal of these cases. The progress is being reviewed every month. It has also been decided to take up the revision of PPOs suo-moto rather than waiting for an application from the pensioner. The said letter is under issue. Secretary (Pension, AR&PG) desired that the same may be issued by 15th June, 2013.Secretary, Pension des,red that necessary chances in systems may be made if that would facilitate the pension sanction and payment processes in the Raliways. The present pension authorisaton is decentralised In the Railways. Secretary, Pension also stated that he will write to the Chairman, Railway Board in this matter.
CGDA, Ministry of Defence intimated that they hope to complete the exercise by 30th September, 2013.
Action : CPAO, Ministry of Railways,
Ministry of Defence & DOP&PW
(iv) Fixation of Revised Pension (1/3rd of commuted portion of pension) in respect of Government servant who had drawn lump sum payment on absorption - revision by multiplying pre revised 1/3rd pension by a factor of 2.26.
CAT, Hyderabad Bench, vide its order dated 22.4.2013, has directed, to pass an order for revision of pension of absorbee pensioner’s. The Staff Side was informed that the matter was under examination in consultation with Department of Expenditure.
(V) Commutation of Pension
(a) Revision of old / new commutation table and
(b) Restoration of commutation period to be reduced from 15 to 12 years.
It was explained that the matter of revision of old/new commutation table was discussed with Department of Expenditure. It was observed that this issue should be considered by the next pay commission.
JCM intimated that by the new commutation table, the restoration of the commuted portion is completed by 11 years because interest rate is at 8% unlike the old table wherein the restoration period was after 15 years because interest rate was taken at 4.75%. Department of Expenditure stated that issue for this old/new commutation table can be studied only by a specialised body and hence could be looked into by the IRDA. However, these are larger issues for which a holistic view needs tobe taken by a body like the Pay Commission. However, the matter may be referred to Department of Expenditure.
(vi) Family pension to divorced/Widowed/Unmarried daughter of a Government Servant.
Difficulty faced by them in getting family pension sanctioned.
Difficulty faced by them in getting family pension sanctioned.
Life Time Arrear.
JCM did not raise any specific point in this regard. In fact, it was mentioned by the JCM members that the legal view on the issue of nomination of life time arrear of family pension is that since he/she has not earned the family pension he/she also can not have the right to nominate. As such, the matter may be dropped.
(vii) Payment of arrears of pension/family pension on account of revision of pension/family pension with effect from 1.1.2006.
Specific case of bank In Chandrapur.
It was informed that the matter was taken up with CPPC, Mumbal (SBI), who informed that the payment to pensioners is being made and there is no such case where pension has not been revised as per 6th CPC. Hence the matter may be dropped.
(viii) Payment of Pension to the spouse of pensioners through S.B. account opened jointly with spouse
- Problem in SBI.
CPAO has informed that necessary instructions in this regard have been issued to all CPPCs with the direction to bring the contents to the notice of all paying branches. CPAO was requested to give a copy to the JCM. It was decided to drop the matter.
3. The representatives of JCM also desired the status of eight agenda items sent by Shri Shiva Gopal Mishra, General Secretary, AIRE which were not included may also be intimated clearly. This may be informed to him separately.
4. After above discussion on Action Taken Report on the minutes of meeting dated 6.11.2012, fresh agenda items were taken for discussion which are as under
(i) Equitable Gratuity under Rule 50 of Pension Rules. Slabs are too wide leading to disparity.
Rule 50 of Pension Rus provide the following death gratuity to the family of the deceased Government servant.
| SI.No. | Length of service | Rate of death gratuity |
| 1 | Less than one year | 2 times of emoluments |
| 2 | One year or more but less than 5 years. | 6 times of emoluments. |
| 3 | 5 years or more but less than 20 years. | 12 times of emoluments. |
| 4 | 20 years or more. | Half month of emoluments for every completed six monthly period of qualifying service subject to a maximum of 33 times of emoluments. |
The JCM (Staff Side) has stated that the slab given at SI. No. 3 above is not equitable and suggested the following revision
| 3(i) | 5 years or more but less than 11 years | 12 times of emoluments. |
| 3(ii) | 11 years or more but less than 20 years | 20 times of emoluments. |
This issue was discussed in the JCM meeting. The present slab of death gratuity was introduced w.e.f. from 1.1.1986 and was introduced as per the recommendations of 4th Central Pay Commission, vide this Department’s OM No. 2/1/1987-PIC-II dated 14.4.1987, This slab has not been revised since 1986. In between, the 5th and 6th Pay Commission had submitted their reports but no revision had been recommended. After discussions, it was decided that the matter may be examined in consultation with Department of Expenditure.
Action: DOP&PW
(ii) Extension of CS (MA) Rules, 1944 to Central Government Pensioners residing in non-CGHS areas.
The Staff Side demanded that as in the case of serving employees, the CS (MA) Rules may be extended to the pensioners also. This would make pensioners in the non CGHS areas entitled for reimbursement of medical expenses. Staff Side also mentioned that Honble Supreme Court has dismissed some SLPs and allowed reimbursement of medical examination of pensioners, in accordance with CS (MA) Rules.
The representative from Ministry of Health informed that the proposal for extension of CS (MA) Rules 1944 to Central Government pensioners was not agreed to in view of huge financial impliations. In regard to the dismissal oF SLP flied by Department against order of courts/tribunals for grant of medical benefits irn individual cases, Ministry of Health has flied a review petition in Supreme Court. It was also informed that Ministry of Health is contemplating Health Insurance Scheme on pan India basis keeping special focus on the non CHGS areas. This Is expected to solve the problems of pensioner’s living in non CGHS areas. The item was treated as closed.
(iii) Grant of modified parity with reference to the Revised Pay Scale corresponding to pre revised Pay Scale of the post from which an employee had retired — upgraded pay scale Instead of normal replacement scales.
The JCM suggested that upgraded revised pay scales may be notionally extended and used for pension fixation instead of normal replacement scales.
It was informed that after the 5th Pay Commission also modified parity was allowed with reference to replacement pay scales and not with the upgraded pay scales. This decision of Government was also upheld by Supreme Court in its judgement dated 23.11.2006 in the CA No. 3173-3174/2006 & 3188-3190/2006 (K. S. Krishna Swamy Vs. UOI). In the 6th CPC the same principle has been followed in view of the above. It was informed that it would not be possible to reopen this issue.Therefore, the Ítem may be closed.
5. The meeting ended with a vote of thanks to the chair.
Source: AIRF
[http://www.airfindia.com/DOPT/Minutes%20of%20Pensionary%20Benefit%20Meeting_12.06.2013.pdf]
Source: AIRF
[http://www.airfindia.com/DOPT/Minutes%20of%20Pensionary%20Benefit%20Meeting_12.06.2013.pdf]
No comments:
Post a Comment