KAVALIPOST

Monday 3 August 2015

30% salary hike confirmed in 7th Pay Commission



“The wages of public sector bank employees are revised once every five years. The recent 10th Bipartite wage agreement gave them an increase of 15%.”

United Forum of Bank Unions (UFBU) had initially put forth a demand of 21% wage hike. It was only after an extensive series of negotiations that the Indian Bank Association agreed to settle for 15%.

For Central Government Employees, once every ten years, a high level committee is constituted by Central Government to revise the pay and allowances. The commission will examine pay structure, concessions and facilities/benefits as well as retirement benefits of Central Staff based on Terms of reference given to them. The Commission has to submit its recommendations within 18 months of the date of its constitution.


All the employees’ Trade unions, Associations and Federations are given a chance to meet the committee and present their demands and expectations in the form of memorandums. All these stages have been completed. The pay commission is expected to submit its report to the central government this month.

The prime question which comes naturally in every one is mind is  how much increase the Central Government employees will get?

In our point of view, all Central employees can surely get a uniform 30% increase in salaries with effect from 01.01.2016, irrespective of ranks and length of service.

Let us assume that an employee who had been recruited after the implementation of the 6th Pay Commission, draws a salary of, on an average, Rs.30,000, including all allowances. Then, after the implementation of 7th Pay Commission, his salary will increase by 30%, and be Rs.39,000.

Everybody, including the NC JCM and the news websites, is expecting maximum hike. That is entirely their discretion. They would have a reason too – simple reason is ‘if you want to get what you want then you should ask more than thatí. They are hoping for a 60% to 70% increase’.

This is where most misconceptions occur. Even English newspapers are no exceptions, and have misquoted the numbers.

The minimum basic pay, as decided by the 6th Pay Commission, was Rs.7000. The basic salary of the lowest rank employee, who was recruited after the implementation of the 6th Pay Commission, was Rs.7000 per month, plus allowances. Almost ten years later, the basic pay of the same lowest ranked employee who was recruited after July 2015, is Rs.15330 (7000 + 119% DA) and allowances. The Dearness Allowance, which is given twice a year, began at zero and has increased to 119% in the past 10 years.

The Central Government employees’ Federation, NC JCM Staff Side had, in its memorandum to the 7th Pay Commission, hoped for a revised minimum basic pay of Rs.26000 (a 70% hike), instead of Rs.15330. The Federation had detailed and defended with irrefutable explanations and justification for their demands.

In News Media , Articles are being written questioning the basis on which the Federation is demanding a 3 times hike in salary..?

In fact, it is not clear on what basis they are publishing articles that Federations were asking a 3 times salary hike and central govt employees can get 3 times hike !

“An employee’s salary hike depends on a number of factors, including the pay commission, wage revision, promotion, etc. The normal procedure to find out the percentage of hike is to calculate it on the basis of the pre-hike salary. But, it is ridiculous to see some people calculate the increase based on the salary drawn by the employee ten years ago, and claim that they are going to receive multiple-times of salary hike.”

It is almost tragic to see employees, lured by the misguiding claim of a Multiplication Factor of 2.86, assuming that there will be a threefold salary hike.

The salaries of all Central Government employees from January 2016 onwards will be 30% higher than the pay of December 2015.

People who differ from this opinion, and those who are convinced that it is very low, are requested to calculate the percentage of salary hike of December 2005 and January 2006. This was the hike recommended by the 6th Pay Commission. Also, if possible, try to find out the percentage of increase in salary of December 1995 and January 1996. This was hike recommended by the 5th Pay Commission.

It has become very obvious that the Central Government employees are under some kind of spell when it comes to salary hikes. This is an attempt to dispel the illusion.

I shall resume this article with your esteemed feedback.


Child care leave right of every working woman: CAT



Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) has ruled that child care leave (CCL) was the right of every working woman, while directing the Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, to reinstate an employee who was sacked for proceeding on CCL.

Anu Sharma, a mother of two, who worked as senior laboratory technician, department of advanced paediatric centre, PGIMER, was sacked for failing to join the institute after her plea for extension of CCL was turned down by the institute.

Directing PGIMER to reinstate Anu, the tribunal had held that every woman had the natural right to take care of her children and keeping in view this, child care leave was introduced as a matter of right for the working women.


The tribunal in its order said, "CCL of two years has been allowed to women employees as a welfare measure. Staff shortage can always be addressed through short-term appointments and the institute such as the PGIMER has the autonomy/authority to make such arrangements."

Providing relief to Anu, the tribunal observed, "The PGIMER has not stated that the grounds on which the applicant was applying for CCL were not genuine. Apparently, the leave was refused only on account of perceived shortage of staff. The PGIMER authorities appear to have taken an unduly harsh view in the matter."

The tribunal held, "Memo of charges dated September 21, 2011 is quashed. The PGIMER is directed to reinstate the applicant in service and treat the period for which she was not on duty as leave of the kind due/leave without pay as may be appropriate within 45 days."


The complaint

Anu had served the PGIMER from May 1997 to November 2012 in the capacity of junior/senior lab technician.

On her request, child care leave for six months from July 12, 2010 to January 7, 2011 was sanctioned. Before her leave came to an end, she applied for extension of the leave from January 10, 2011 to July 8, 2012 to complete two years' of child care leave as originally applied for, but it was refused.

At the time of applying for the leave, Anu had said that she had a daughter aged 8 and a 13-year-old son, who was medically unfit.

The request of the applicant for extension of child care leave as well as for leave without pay was rejected. Since the applicant did not join duty, the PGIMER issued memo of charges on September 21, 2011, for lack of devotion to her duty.

After issuance of memo she resumed duty and worked till May 14, 2012. Thereafter, she remained on sanctioned leave from May 2012 to August 2012 and further applied for CCL from September 17, 2012. Finally, her services were terminated through an order on April 24, 2014.


Penalty on her does not merit reconsideration: PGIMER

Contesting the claims of Anu, the PGIMER said since Anu had remained willfully absent from duty, thus penalty imposed upon her does not merit reconsideration.

They said that the head, department of paediatrics, forwarded the application with the remarks that further leave cannot be granted due to shortage of staff or a replacement may be provided. They said that the competent authority considered and declined the request of the applicant seeking extension of CCL and she was categorically told that CCL had been rejected and she was being treated as 'willfully absent from duty' since January 8, 2011.

She was directed to resume duty immediately, failing which disciplinary action would be initiated.


119% DA DR from July 2015 with 6% hike likely: June, 2015 CPI-IW released


da+dr+july+2015
As already calculated in March, 2015April 2015May, 2015 the DA/DR will be 119% with effect from July, 2015, it is now confirmed with 3 points increase in June, 2015 CPI-IW.  As per press release issued on 31st July, 2015 by Labour Bureau the All India Consumer Price Index for Industrial Worker for the month  June, 2015 increased by 3 points and pegged at 261. The 6% hike in future DA/DR from July, 2015 i.e. DA/DR will be 119% from July, 2015 is now registered. 

Dearness Allowance for Central Government Staff and Dearness Relief for Pensioners with effect from July, 2015 is likely to increase 6% and to be 119% the present DA/DR is 113%.  The following table is final calculation of DA/DR from July, 2015. The installment of DA/DR from Jul-2015 is important for projected pay and allowances in 7th CPC.







Bureaucrats attempt to be-fool the Pensioners!

When will the Bureaucrats change their character?
Errors and Omission in the latest order dated 30th July


It seems the Indian Bureaucrats will never change themselves! Read the latest order of the Department of Pension & Pensioners Welfare dated 30th July 2015 on ‘Revision of pension of pre-2006 pensioners’ very carefully. It contains some erroneous statements and next it fails to incorporate the essence of another judgment of the Supreme Court regarding grant of full pension for pre-2006 pensioners with less than 33 years of service.

This latest order fails to mention the mistake committed in the clarification OM dated 3.10.2008 in the first paragraph. On the other hand the order wrongly says as though the clarification OM repeated the same thing as that of the original Para 4.2 of OM dated 1.9.2008. It fails to mention that clarificatory OM dated 3.10.2008 had actually twisted the words “pay in the pay band” into “minimum of the pay band”! One who reads the latest order will naturally get confused as to what is the difference between the original OM dated 1.9.2008 and the clarificatory OM dated 3.10.2008 against which six years of legal battles were being waged by the Senior Citizens?

Similarly the latest order again distorts the nature of the prayers by Petitioners in the CAT. The prayer in the CAT was for demanding fixation of pension to pre-2006 pensioners was to cancel the clarificatory OM’s contention of “Minimum of the Pay Band” and uphold the “Pay of the Pay Band plus the Grade Pay appropriate to the pre-revised pay scale” read with the fitment table annexed to the MOF, DOE OM as recommended by the 6th CPC. But the latest order distorts the prayers of pensioners and says as though the pensioners in the CAT had demanded only what was wrongly stated in the clarificatory OM dated 3.10.2008 instead of the original OM dated 1.9.2008!!

Even though the Para 4 of the latest order dated 30th July practically solves the problem faced by pre-2006 pensioners by changing the date of effect of OM dated 28-01-2013 with effect from 1.1.2006 instead of 24-09-2012, it can be seen that this order is drafted in such a nasty manner. What is the meaning of that? Are the bureaucrats are foolish enough to fail to understand the difference between the original OM and the clarificatory OM? If so they are fools. But they are not fools because they are trying to make the lakhs of pensioners look like fools? One thing is sure. The Indian Bureaucrats will never change their character even on the face of repeated blows they receive at the hands of the Judiciary.

Secondly, it can be seen that while the Para 4 of this latest order set rights the problem of fixation of pension of pre-2006 pensioners as per the original OM dated 1.9.2008, it refuses to incorporate the essence of another Supreme Court verdict upholding Kerala High Court and the CAT Ernakulam Bench viz., to grant full pension to pre-2006 pensioners with less than 33 years of service in the light of the fact that the Para 4.2 never mentions about pro-rata fixation of pension to pensioners with less than 33  years of service. This also shows the mindset of the Bureaucrats and the Government that they do not want to honour the judgments of the highest court of the land.  This is the character of the Indian Bureaucracy that never wants to bow its head before anything including the Apex Court! When will they change for the better? We do not  know!

This Association is writing to the Minister concerned about the above facts for effecting necessary corrections in the latest order.

K.Ragavendran

General Secretary




Dattatreya all for reforms in BSNL, IT and Postal Depts



Union Labour Minister Bandaru Dattatreya on Saturday promised to take up with the Central government the request of India Post to double up as employment exchanges and data collection centres for agricultural produce in rural areas.

The Minister held a meeting with representatives of Income Tax, BSNL and postal departments here on Saturday to invite their suggestions for better performance in TS and AP. At a media conference that followed, Mr. Dattatreya said he will support integration of employment exchange with postal department in the two States. “There are a total of 16,155 post offices in the two States and these could act as franchises of employment exchanges.

Currently, just a few employment exchanges are managing the bulk of details of unemployed people in each of the States in the country,” he said. Post offices could also serve as data collection centres for farm produces in each of the districts.

“India Post in the two States has agreed to compile list of farm produce on a website for customers from urban areas to buy without the support of middlemen,” the Minister said


Over 14,000 posts for persons with disabilities vacant: Government

NEW DELHI: Over 14,000 posts earmarked for persons with disabilities have been lying vacant in various central government ministries, banks and PSUs, Rajya Sabha was informed today.
The Centre has asked all concerned to carry out a special drive to fill these vacancies, Minister of State for Personnel Jitendra Singh said in a written reply.
As per the data received from various departments, nationalised banks, financial institutions, central public sector undertakings, among others, there were 14,267 vacancies identified for persons with disabilities, he said.
These included backlog vacancies carried forward from earlier years. "Out of these 14,267 vacancies, 2,990 vacancies identified were in respect of Group A or equivalent posts," the minister said.
The government had issued instructions in May this year to all concerned to take immediate necessary action for filling up of vacancies for persons with disabilities and to launch a special recruitment drive to fill up these vacancies by February 2016, he said.


Government plans to introduce 'no-work-no-pay' for MPs

VARANASI/NEW DELHI: Amid a logjam in Parliament, Union Minister Mahesh Sharma has said there is a suggestion for applying 'no work, no pay' policy on MPs like it is being done with regard to bureaucrats, triggering a debate after which he went into a denial mode.

"There is a suggestion that like for the bureaucrats there is 'no work, no pay', we should implement for the MPs also," he told reporters in Varanasi in Uttar Pradesh yesterday.

Sharma, the Minister for Tourism and Culture, went on to add that the government is planning this and senior ministers are in touch with the opposition to reach a consensus.

"There is a planning for it. Our government is trying and our senior ministers are in touch with the opposition. There is an effort to reach a consensus before the tough action is taken," he said.

On a visit to Varanasi, Sharma was replying to the queries of reporters as to whether the union government was mulling over any proposal of 'no work, no pay' policy for the MPs stalling Parliament as public money is going waste.

Parliament has not been functioning properly ever since the Monsoon session began on July 21 as the opposition parties have been pressing for resignation of External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj and Rajasthan Chief Minister Vasundhara Raje in connection with Lalit Modi controversy and Madhya Pradesh Chief Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan over Vyapam Scam. respectively 

The comments triggered a debate, with opposition parties wanting to know if it was his view or that of the government.

Amidst this, Sharma today said, "I still want to see what I had said.... Definitely it is not my statement and I just want to see that."

He added that, "I am not the authorised person. I am not the competent person, and I am not the required person to comment on this issue. I think this will be a matter of our Speaker and our senior ministers to discuss."

"I understand that when the Member of Parliament doesn't work, it is as per the order of the Speaker. The Speaker says that the House is adjourned. So I will not call, but the whole country, the common man is behind this that the Parliament should run," Sharma said.

He said there should be no wastage of tax payer's money.

"People are watching how opposition is behaving in this manner and they are not allowing Parliament to run in a democratic manner... I would want to see if somebody raises this question over there that when a worker doesn't get a salary what should happen," the minister added.

Earlier reacting to his yesterday's comments, Congress spokesperson Manish Tewari wondered why the government was having "this sudden change of heart."

To hit out at the NDA government, he said BJP had vociferously opposed the same suggestion given by Congress after the then opposition party had "wiped out" an entire session of Parliament in 2010.
CPI leader D Raja asked whether this is Sharma's individual suggestion or represents the government's view.

"One should ask the Union Minister whether it is a proposal made by him or by the government itself. The minister should not make some irresponsible comment," Raja said.

Government has been making all possible efforts to end the two-week-long deadlock in Parliament with an all-party meeting scheduled for tomorrow.

Speaker Sumitra Mahajan had also convened an all party meeting to end the deadlock.

In Varanasi, Sharma had accused the opposition parties of playing "spoilsport" because of "lack of issues to debate" and said the government is ready to debate on any issue.

"BJP and our government want that the Parliament should function. But when someone doesn't have any issue to debate on, then the tactic is to play a 'spoilsport'," Sharma said.

No comments:

Post a Comment