KAVALIPOST

Tuesday, 18 June 2013

Declaration of bonus on PLI policies for the year 2010-11

Click here to view  Directorate of Postal Life Insurance memo No 04-02/2012-LI dated 17.06.2013 on the above subject matter.


Promotion and postings in the Grade of Assistant Director(Recruitment) in Circle Office.

.CLICK HERE to view Directorate memo on the above subject matter.

PS Gr. B examination 2013 - An update

It was informed by General Secretary of IP/ASP association that there is no progress in recasting of marks of PS Gr. B examination 2012 and because of that the   PS Gr. B examination for the year 2013 is likely to be delayed

Inspector Posts Examination 2013 - An update

The above said examination is likely to be held on 7th and 8th September, 2013. Directorate is issuing notification soon.


NATIONAL COUNCIL JCM ON PENSIONARY MATTERS – MINUTES OF MEETING HELD ON 28.05.2013 WITH THE REPRESENTATIVES OF STAFF SIDE

F. No. 42/7/2013-P&PW(G)
Government of India
Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances & Pensions
Department of Pension & Pensioners‘ Welfare
3rd Floor, Lok Nayak Bhavan,
Khan Market, New Delhi – 110003

Dated : 12th June, 2013

OFFICE MEMORANDUM 

Subject : Minutes of the meeting held on 28.5.2013 with the representatives of Staff Side, National Council JCM on pensionary matters.

The undersigned is directed to enclose herewith a copy of minutes of the meeting held on 28.5.2013 with the representatives of the Staff Side, National Council JCM on pensionary matters under the chairmanship of
Secretary (Pension, AR&PG) in room No. 310, Lok Nayak B Khan Market, New Delhi for information/ necessary action,
Enclosure: As above.
sd/-
(Sujasha Choudhury)
Dy. Secretary (P)
DEPARTMENT OF PENSION AND  PENSIONERS’ WELFARE
MINUTES OF THE MEETING WITH THE REPRESENTATIVES OF STAFF SIDE, NATIONAL COUNCIL JCM ON PENSIONARY MATTERS UNDER THE CHAIRMANSHIP OF SECRETARY (PENSION, AR&PG) ON 28.5.2013 AT LOK NAYAK BHAWAN, NEW DELHI

Secretary (Pension, AR&PG) chaired a meeting with the representatives of Staff Side, National Council JCM on 28.5.2013 to discuss various issues relatingto pension and other retirement benefits. The list of participants is at Annexure-I.  Secretary (Pension, AR&PG) welcomed the participants and appreciated the contributions of the pensioners in the overall development of their respective organisation.
2. The meeting started with a discussion on the Action Taken Report on the minutes of the meeting held on 6.11.2012 as per details given below:
(i) Ex-gratia payment to SRPF/CPF beneficiaries who retired other than on superannuation, i.e. voluntary retirement and medical invalidation cases.
Department of Expenditure has given clearance for deletion of clause ‘c’ of para 2 of OM dated 22.3.2004 which prohibits grant of ex-gratia payment to those retired from service other than superannuation. With this, CPF beneficiary who have retired voluntarily and on medical grounds after 20 years of service will also be granted ex-gratia. It was decided that this agenda item will be closed after issue of a revised OM by the DOP&PW.  Ministry of Railways will also issue similar orders.
Action DOP&PW and Ministry of Railways
(ii) Raising quantum of ex-gratia to CPF retirees on the lines of SRPF
The latest status of the case was intimated to the JCM.  After the issue of orders by this Department, consequent to the decision of Cabinet the item may be dropped.
Action : DOP&PW
(iii) Abnormal delay in the issue of revised PPO to Pre – 2006 retirees,pensioners / family pensioners.
(i) It was intimated that the Department had taken the following initiatives like (a) allowing change in date of birth of spouse, (b) use of certain documents as proof of date of birth of spouse, (c) inclusion of present postal address and mobile and telephone number in the life certificate (d) use of e-scroll for extracting information from banks’ database. (e) revision of PPOs even in cases where date of birth/age of spouse is not given in the PPO or this information is not available in the office records for speedy revision of PPOs.
(ii) As a result, the number of pending revision cases for civil pensioners has come down from 2,54,467 in August, 2012 to 74,000 as on April, 2013 as per information given by the CPAO on the basis of e-scrolls.
(iii) However, amendment in calculation of revised pension, vide OM dated 28.1.13, has necessitated issue of revised authority in all cases, as indicated in OM dated 13.2.13.
Secretary (Pension, AR&PG) stated that record/information of many pensioners are not available with the Departments, which is hampering further progress and the Pensioners Associations should come forward to help the departments in reaching out to the pensioners/family pensioners. He further stated that Secretaries of various Departments have been requested to review the issue of revision of PPO in the fortnightly/monthly meetings.
Railways stated that in case of pre 2006 pensioners advertisement has been issued. Matter was taken up with RBI to issue notification to all banks Out of 10.89 lakh such cases, 5.46 have been issued revised P.P.Os. Meetings are generally held at various levels. 30th September, 2013 has been set as the target date for disposal of these cases. The progress is being reviewed every month. It has also been decided to take up the revision of PPOs suo-moto rather than waiting for anapplication from the pensioner. The said letter is under issue. Secretary (Pension, AR&PG) desired that the same may be issued by 15th June, 2013. Secretary, Pension desired that necessary changes in systems may be made if that would facilitate the pension sanction and payment processes in the Railways. The present pension authorisation is decentralised in the Railways, Secretary, Pension also stated that he will write to the Chairman, Railway Board in this matter.
CGDA, Ministry of Defence intimated that they hope to complete the exercise by 30th September, 2013.
Action : CPAO, Ministry of Railways,
Ministry of Defence & DOP&PW
(iv) Fixation of Revised Pension (1/3 of commuted portion of Pension) in respect of Government servant who had drawn lump sum payment on absorption –  revision by multiplying pre revised pension by a factor of 2.26
CAT, Hyderabad Bench, vide its order dated 22.4.2013, has directed, to pass an order for revision ofpension of absorbee pensioner’s. The Staff Side was informed that the matter was under examination in consultation with Department of Expenditure.
(v) Commutation of Pension(a) Revision of old/ new commutation table and
(b) Restoration of commutation period to be reduced from 15 to 12 years.
It was explained that the matter of revision of old/new commutation table was discussed withDepartment of Expenditure.
It was observed that this issue should be considered by the next pay commission.
JCM intimated that by the new commutation table, the restoration of the commuted portion is completed by 11 years because interest rate is at 8% unlike the old table wherein the restoration period was after 15 years because interest rate was taken at 4.75%. Department of Expenditure stated that issue for this old/new commutation table can be studied only by a specialised body and hence could be looked into by the IRDA. However, these are larger issues for which a holistic viewneeds to be taken by a body like the Pay Commission. However, the matter may be referred toDepartment of Expenditure.
(vi) Family pension to divorced/Widowed/ Unmarried daughter of a Government Servant.- Difficulty faced by them in getting family pensionsanctioned.- Life Time Arrear.
JCM did not raise any specific point in this regard. In fact, it was mentioned by the JCM members that the legal view on the issue of nomination of life time arrear of family pension is that since he/she has not earn the family pension he/she also can not have the right to nominate.  As such, the matter may be dropped.
(vii) Payment of arrear pension/family pension on account of revision ofpension family pension with effect from 1.1.2006- Specific of bank in Chandrapur.
It was informed that the matter was taken up with CPPC, Mumbai (SBI), who informed that the payment to pensioners is being made and there is no such case where pension has not been revised as per 6th CPC. Hence the matter may be dropped.
(viii) Payment of Pension to the spouse of pensioners through S.B. account opened jointly with spouse - Problem in SBI.
CPAO has informed that necessary instructions in this regard have been issued to all CPPCs with the direction to bring the contents to the notice of all payingbranches. CPAO was requested to give a copy to the 3C1v1. It was decided to drop the matter.
3. The representatives of 3CM also desired the status of eight agenda items sent by Shri Shiva Gopa I Mishra, General Secretary, AIRF which were not included may also be intimated clearly. This may be informed to him separately.
4. After above discussion on Action Taken Report on the minutes of meeting dated 6.11.2012, fresh agenda items were taken for discussion which are as under:
(i) Equitable Gratuity under Rule 50 of Pension Rules. Slabs are too wide leading to disparity.
Rule 50 of Pension Rules provide the following death gratuity to the family of the deceased Government servant.
Sl.No.
Length of service
Rate of death gratuity
1
Less than one year.
2 times or emoluments.
2
One year or more but less than 5years.
6 times of emoluments.
3
5 years or more but less than 20 years.
12 times of emoluments.
4.
20 years or more.
Half month of emoluments for every completed six monthly period of qualifying service subject to a maximum of 33 times of emoluments.
The JCM (Staff Side) has stated that the given at Sl. No. 3 above is not equitable and suggested the following revision: -
3(i)
5 Years or more but less than 11 years
12 times of emoluments.
3(ii)
11 years or more but less than 20 years
20 times of emoluments
This issue was discussed in the JCM meeting. The present slab of death gratuity was introduced w.e.f. from 1.1.1986 and was introduced as per the recommendations of 4th Central Pay Commission, vide this Departmen No. 2/1/1987-PIC-II dated 14.4.1987. This slab has not be revised since 1986. In between, the 5th and 6th Pay Commission had submitted their reports but no revision had been recommend.  After discussions, it was decided that the matter may be examined in consultation with Department of Expenditure.
Action: DOP&PW
(ii) Extension of CS (MA) Rules, 1944 to Cetnral Government Pensioners residing in non-CGHS areas.
The Staff Side demanded that as in the case of serving employees, the CS (MA) Rules may be extended to the pensioners also.  This would make pensioners in the non CGHS areas entitled for reimbursement of medical expenses.  Staff Side also mentioned that Hon’ble Supreme Court has dismissed some SLPs and allowed reimbursement of medical examination of pensioners, in accordance with CS(MA) Rules.
The representative from Ministry of Health informed that the proposal for extension of CS (MA) Rules 1944 to Central Government pensioners was not agreed to in view of huge financial implications. In regard to the dismissal of SLP filed by Department against order of courts/tribunals for grant of medical benefits in individual cases, Ministry of Health has filed a review petition in Supreme Court. It was also informed that Ministry of Health is contemplating Health Insurance Scheme on pan India basis keeping special focus on the non CHGS areas. This is expected to solve the problems of pensioner’s living in non CGHS areas. The item was treated as closed.
(iii) Grant of modified parity with reference to the Revised Pay Scale corresponding to pre revised Pay Scale of the post from which an employee had retired – upgraded pay scale instead of normal replacement scales.
The JCM suggested that upgraded revised pay scales may be notionally extended and used for pension fixation instead of normal replacement scales.
It was informed that after the 5th Pay Commission also modified parity was allowed with reference to replacement pay scales and not with the upgraded pay scales. This decision of Government was also upheld by Supreme Court in its judgement dated 23.11.2006 in the CA No. 3173-3174/2006 & 3188¬3190/2006  (K. S. Krishna Swamy Vs. UOI).  In the 6th CPC the same principle has been followed in view of above. It was informed that it would not be possible to reopen this issue.Therefore, the item may be closed.
5. The meeting ended with a vote of thanks to chair.

SUBMISSION OF LIFE CERTIFICATES WITH ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IN NOVEMBER EVERY YEAR


To view details, please CLICK HERE

National Award for eGovernance 2013-14- Purpose and other detail of the Award


To view please Click Here.

Appointment of Information commissioners in the central Information commission


To view the Circular please Click Here.

Promotion process 2013-14 – Relaxations regarding Rural/Semi-urban experience and field experience for Specialist Officers


F.No.4/11/3/2013-IR
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Financial Services

Jeevan Deep, IIIrd Floor,
Parliament Street, New Delhi
Dated the June 3, 2013

To
CEOs of all PSBs 

Subject: Promotion process 2013-14 – Relaxations regarding Rural/Semi-urban experience and field experience for Specialist Officers 

Sir, 
I am directed to refer to this Department’s letter of even number dated 4.4.2013 and 22.5.2013 on the above subject and to say that references received from PSBs seeking relaxations in the guidelines for promotion process 2013-14 have been examined in this Department.

2. It has been decided that if required the Banks may, with the approval of their Boards, provide relaxations, in the guidelines on promotion on the following points:-

i) In case officers being considered for promotion for the year 2013-14 do not have sufficient rural/semi-urban experience they may be posted to such areas, post promotion, in order to fulfil the mandatory requirement.

ii) In case officers of specialized cadre being considered for promotion for the year 2013-14 do not have sufficient experience of field operations , they may be posted to such positions post promotion, in order to fulfil the mandatory requirement.

3. The Banks may extend such relaxation/ deviation only if required and must properly record the reasons in the minutes of the Board meeting.

4. This issues with the approval of Secretary (FS). 

Yours faithfully,
sd/-
(Manish Kumar)
Under Secretary to the Government of India
Copy to all Government Nominee Directors

Source: www.financialservices.gov.in
[http://financialservices.gov.in/download.asp?rec=267&NotificationType=C]

Financial Services Orders - Delay in payment of pensionary benefits to the Ex-Servicemen


Financial Services Orders - Delay in payment of pensionary benefits to the Ex-Servicemen

F.No.8/1/2012-B.0.III
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Financial Services
(B.O.III Section)
******

2nd Floor, Jeevan Deep Building
10, Parliament Street, New Delhi-110 001
07th June, 2013

To
(i). The Chief Executives of all Pension Paying Banks.
(ii). The Chief General Manager, In-charge, Customer Service Department,
Reserve Bank of India, Central Office, Mumbai.

Sub.: Delay in payment of pensionary benefits to the Ex-Servicemen.

Sir,
I am directed to refer to the subject cited above and to say that a case of non-payment of ex-gratia amount of Rs. 9 lakhs by the UCO Bank, Jhajjar Branch came to the notice of the Department of Financial Services with the approaching that there may be more cases of nonpayment of pensionary benefits to ex-servicemen causing frustration and feeling of isolation in the minds of those who gave their best of life for defence of nation. Such instances may be easily lapped up by the media to paint a negative picture of the PSBs and the Government which could be avoided with a little alacrity on the part of the banking officials.

2. It is therefore requested to kindly look into the matter on top priority basis by sensitizing the bank officials to be more prompt on payment of pensionary benefits to the ex-servicemen without any further delay and also to the CPPCs which need to be streamlined for timely release of pensionary dues to the Armed Forces pensioners. Action taken in this regard beintimated to this Department at the earliest.

Yours faithfully,
sd/-
(Rakesh Kumar Gupta)
Under Secretary
Tel: 011 23348993

Source: www.financialservices.gov.in
[http://financialservices.gov.in/download.asp?rec=270&NotificationType=C]


TRAVELLING ALLOWANCE RULES – AMENDMENT TO RULES CONTAINED IN CHAPTER 16 OF INDIAN RAILWAY ESTABLISHMENT CODE VOL,II (SECOND REPRINT EDITION), 2005


Government of India / Bharat Sarkar 
Ministry of Railways / Rail Mantralaya
(Railway Board)

PC-VI No.318/2013
RBE No.49/2013
No. F(E)I/2010/AL-28/36
New Delhi, dated 23.05.2013
The General Managers,
All Indian Railways etc.
(As per Standard Mailing List)

Sub: Travelling Allowance Rules – Amendment to rules contained in Chapter 16 of Indian Railway Establishment Code Vol,II (Second Reprint Edition), 2005.

Ref: Board’s letter No. (i) F(E)1/2008/AL-28/14 dated 1.12,2008 and 23.04.2009, 
(ii) F(E)1/2008/AL-7/3 dated 3.10.08, 
(iii) E(P&A)II-2008/HRA-10 dated 12.9.2008 
(iv) F(E)I/2008/AL-28/42 dated 19.8.2010 
(v) F(E)I/2008/AL-28/15 dated 1.12.2008, 29,12.2010 & 8.3.2011, 
(vi) F(E)I/2011/AL-28/26 dated 01.09.2011 & 14.02.2012 
(vii) F(E)I/2008/AL-7/2 dated 18.09.08 and F(E)I/89/AL-23/8 dated 2.11.1989

In exercise of the powers conferred by the proviso to Article 309 of the Constitution of India, the President is pleased to direct that Rules 1602, 1603, 1606, 1607, 1611, 1612, 1613, 1616, 1625, 1634, 1636, 1641, 1643, 1644, 1645 and Rule 1686 contained in Chapter 16 – Travelling Allowance Rules of Indian Railway Establishment Code, Vol.II (Second Reprint Edition) 2005, may be amended, as per Advance Correction Slip No.  60  enclosed as Annexure.

2. Hindi version is enclosed.

3. Please acknowledge receipt.

sd/-
(Sonali Chaturvedi) 
Dy.Dir.Finance (Estt.) II 
Railway Board

Travelling Allowance Rules - Amendment to rules contained in Chapter 16 of Indian Railway Establishment Code Vol.11 (Second Reprint Edition), 2005.

INDIAN RAILWAY ESTABLISHMENT CODE, VOLUME-II
(SECOND REPRINT EDITION),2005.

ADVANCE CORRECTION SLIP NO. 60

Chapter 16 - TravellIng Allowance Rules

Section No.1 - General

(1) Substitute the following in lieu of existing Rule 1602 (1):

"Rule 1602 (1) - For the purpose of admissibility to Travelling Allowance, entitlement of Railwayservants will be based on the Grade Pay drawn for those drawing Grade Pay upto Rs. 10,000 and pay drawn in Pay Band for those in Pay Scale of HAG and above.
(Authority: Railway Board’s letter No. F(E)I/2008/AL-28/14 dated 1.12.2008).

(2) Rule 1603(1) stands deleted.

(3) Substitute the following in lieu of existing Rule 1603(2):
"Rule 1603 (2) - Non-Practicing Allowance will be reckoned as Basic Pay for computing Composite Transfer Grant”.
(Authority: Railway Board’s letter No. F(E)I/2008/AL-28/15 dated 1.12.2008).

Section IV - Conveyance Allowance

(1) Substitute the existing table under Rule 1606(4) with the following:

FIXED CONVEYANCE ALLOWANCE
Average monthly travel on
official duty
For journeys by own motor car
(in Rs.per month)
For journeys by other modes of conveyance
 (in Rs. Per month)
(1)
(2)
(3)
201-300 Kms
1120
370
301-450 Kms
1680
480
451-600Kms
2070
640
601-800 Kms
2430
750
Above 800 Kms
3000
580

Note 1: The rates of fixed Conveyance Allowance shall automatically increase by 25% whenever Dearness Allowance payable on the revised pay structure goes up by 50%.
(Authority: Railway Board’s letter No. F(E)1/2008/AL-7/3 dt.3.10.08)

(2) “NOTE 1” & “NOTE 2” below Rule 1606(4) may be read as “NOTE 2” & “NOTE 3” respectively.

(3) In clause (a) below Railway Ministry’s decision under Rule 1606, substitute the figure "Rs.20/-” with the figure “Rs.60/-”.
(Authority: Railway Board’s letter No. F(E)I/2008/AL-7/2 dt. 18.09.2008)

Section V - Mileage Allowance

(1.) Rule 1607 (5)
Substitute the following table in lieu of existing table under Rule-1607(5):

Grade Pay 
(1)
Entitlement 
(2)
(i)Officers drawing grade pay of Rs.10,000 and those In pay scale of HAG OR and above.Actual fare by any type of public bus including air-conditioned bus
OR
At prescribed rates of AC taxi when the journey is actually performed by AC Taxi
OR
At prescribed rates for Ordinary Taxi when the journey is actually performed by Ordinary Taxi/Own Car
OR
At prescribed rates for auto rickshaw for journeys by auto-rickshaw, own scooter, motor cycle, moped etc.
(ii) Officers drawing grade pay of Rs.5400, Rs. 6600, Rs.7600, Rs.8700 and Rs.8900.Same as at (i) above with the exception that journeys by AC taxi will not be permissible
(iii) Officers drawing grade pay of Rs.4200, Rs.4600 and Rs.4800.Same as at (ii) above.
(iv) Officers drawing grade pay of Rs.2400 and above but less than Rs.4200.Actual fare by any type of public bus other than air-conditioned bus.
OR
At prescribed rates for auto-rickshaw for journeys by auto-rickshaw/own scooter/motorcycle/moped etc.
(v) Officers drawing grade pay below Rs.2400.Actual fare by ordinary public bus only
OR
At prescribed rates for auto-rickshaw/own scooter/motorcycle/moped etc.

(2) Substitute the rates of Mileage Allowance mentioned at (i) & (ii) below the table under Rule 1607(5) with the following:

(i) For journeys performed in own car / taxi : Rs.16 per Km

(ii) For journeys performed by auto-rickshaw: Rs. 8 per Km own scooter, etc.

(3) In the first line of the Note-1 under Rule 1607 (5) substitute the words “pay less than Rs.6500/-” with “Grade Pay less than Rs.4200/-.

(4) In the last line of the Note-2 under Rule 1607 (5) substitute the figure “60 paise” with “Rs.1.20”.

(5) The following note may be added as Note-4 below Rule 1607(5):
“Note-4: The rate for Mileage allowance for road journey by taxi/own car/auto rickshaw/own scooter/tonga/cycle rickshaw/man-driven rickshaw/ bicycle/foot shall automatically increase by 25% whenever Dearness allowance payable on the revised pay structure goes up by 50%.”
(Authority: Railway Board’s letter No. F(E)I/2008/AL-28/14 dated 1.12.2008 and 23.04.2009).

Section VI- Daily Allowance

(1) Substitute the existing table in Rule 1611 wIth the following:

Grade PayDaily Allowance (per day)
Officers drawing grade pay of Rs.10,000/- and those in pay scales of
HAG and above
Rs 520
Officers drawing Officers drawing Officers drawing grade pay of
Rs.7600 to Rs.8900/-
Rs.460
Officers drawing Officers drawing Officers drawing grade pay of
Rs.5400 to Rs.6600/-
Rs.400
Officers drawing Officers drawing Officers drawing grade pay of
Rs.4200 to 4800/-
Rs.340
Officers drawing grade pay of below Rs.4200/-Rs.210
Note: The rates of Daily Allowance shall automatically increase by 25% whenever Dearness Allowance payable on the revised pay structure goes up by 50%.
(Authority: Railway Board’s letter No. F(E)I/2008/AL-28/14 dated 1. 12.2008)

(2) Rule 1612 & Note (1), (2) & (3) below Rule 1612 stand deleted.

(3) Rule 1613 stands deleted.
(Authority: Railway Board’s letter No. E(PM)II-2008/HRA-10 dated 12.9.2008 and F(E)I/2008/AL-28/ 14 dated 1.12.2008)

(4) Rule 1616 stands deleted.
(Authority: Railway Board’s letter No. E(P&A)II-2008/HRA-10 dated 12.9.2008 and F(E)I/2008/AL-28/14 dated 1.12.2008)

Section No.VII - Travelling Allowance for Journeys on Tour

(1) Rule 1625
In the last line of the Note-2 under Rule 1625, substItute the word "pay” with Grade Pay”.

(2) Rule 1634
Substitute the following In lieu of existing Rule 1634.
The entitlement for journeys by Sea or by River Steamer, on tour, is as follows:
Grade Pay
(1)
Entitlement
 (2)
Officers drawing grade pay of Rs.5400/- and above and those in pay scales of HAG and aboveHighest Class
Officers drawing grade pay of Rs.4200, Rs.4600 and Rs.4800If there be two classes only on the steamer, the lower class
Officers drawing grade pay of Rs.2400 and Rs.2800If there be two classes only on the steamer, the lower class

If there be three classes, the middle or the second class

If there be four classes, the third class :
Officers drawing grade pay less than Rs. 2400/-The lowest class-
Accommodation entitlements for travel between the mainland and the A&N Group of Islands and Lakshadweep Group of Islands by ships operated by the Shipping Corporation of India Limited will be as follows:

Grade Pay
(1)
Entitlement 
(2)
Officers drawing grade pay Rs.5400 and above and
those in scales of
HAG and above
Deluxe Class
Officers drawing grade pay Rs.4200, Rs.4600 and
Rs.4800
First/ ‘A’
Cabin Class
Officers drawing grade pay Rs.2400 and
Rs.2800
Second/ ‘B’
Cabin Class
Officers drawing grade pay less than
Rs.2400
Bunk Class

(Authority: Railway Board’s letter No. F(E)I/2008/AL-28/14 dated 1.12.2008)

(3) Substitute the following In lieu of Sub-rule (7) of Rule 1636 as under ; Rule 1636 (7)
Railway officers in pay scale of Rs. 67000-79000 or above may travel at their discretion in Business or Club Class by air within the country on tour. Officers drawing Grade Pay of Rs.10,000/- may also travel by Business/Club Class wIth the approval of Competent
Authority. Other officers and non-officials, who are authorized to travel by air within India at Government expense, shall be entitled to travel by Economy Class only where two classes of accommodation i.e., Economy Class and Business or Club class are available on the airlines.
(Authority: Railway Board’s letter No. F(E)I/2008/AL-28/14 dated 1.12.2008)

Section VIII - Journey at or near Headquarters.

(1) In Rule 1641 (1), substitute the words “drawing a pay of not less than Rs.3200/- per month, under Railway Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 1986” with “ in Grade Pay Rs. 4600 (PB-2) & above and drawing pay not less than Rs. 18050 in the Pay Band (excluding Grade Pay) under Railway Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 2008”. 

In Rule 1641 (2), substitute the words “Railway servants, gazetted or non-gazetted, drawing a pay of less than Rs.3200/- per month shall not be entitled to engage a taxi. They may be permitted to claim conveyance hire as follows:-” with “Railway servants not entitled to engage a taxi in terms of Rule 1641 (1) may be permitted to claim conveyance hire as follows:-”
(Authority: Railway Board’s letter No. F(E)I/2008/AL-28/42 dated 19.08.2010)

Section IX - Transfer Travelling Allowance

Rule 1643 (A)  (1)
(1) Substitute the following in lieu of the existing Rule 1643 (A)(1).
Journeys by Air :-
A Railway Officer holding a post in pay scale of Rs.67000-79000 and above may travel by air, at his discretion, to join the new HQs., on transfer. Officers in the grade pay of Rs 10,000/- may also be permitted to travel by air with the approval of Competent 

Authority, subject to exigency and where joining at transfer station has to be effected with immediate effect. The air fare will, however, be admissible for self only. No family member of any Railway servant is entitled to travel by air on transfer.

(Authority: Railway Board’s letter No. F( E)I/2008/AL-28/15 dated 01.12.2008)

(2) Substitute the following table in lieu of Rule 1643 (B) (2):
1643 (B) (2): Charges for transportation of personal effects between places connected by rail on transfer/retirement:

(I) If the transportation of personal effects is made by rail, the rates as under will be admissible for transporting personal effects from place of residence to the Railway Station at the Old headquarters and from Railway Station to the place of residence, at the new headquarters;

Grade Pay
Rate per km for transport by road (Rs. per.km)
X & Y class cities*
Z class cities*
Officers drawing grade pay of
Rs.4200 and
above and those in pay scale
HAG and above
30.00 (Rs.0.005 per kg per km.)18.00 (Rs.0.003 per kg. per km.)
Officers drawing grade pay of
 Rs.2800/-
15.00 (Rs.0.005 per kg per km.)9.00 (Rs.0.003 per kg. per km.)
Officers drawing grade pay
 below Rs 2800
7.50 (Rs.0.005 per kg per km.)4.60 (Rs.0.0031 per kg. per km.)

The rates for transporting the entitled weight by Steamer will be equal to the prevailing rates prescribed by such transport in ships operated by Shipping Corporation of India.

(Authority: Railway Board’s letters No. F(E)I/2008/AL-28/15 dated 29.12.2010)

(ii) If the transportation of personal effects is made by road, reimbursement of actual expenditure by road limited to rates prescribed as in (I) above will be admissible.

(Authority: Railway Board’s letter No. F(E)I/201 1/AL-28/26 dated 14.02.2012)

(3) The existing Note 1 & 2 below Rule 1643(B)(2) may be deleted and the following may be added as Note - 1 and 2.

Note-1: The higher rates of road mileage prescribed for ‘X’ and ‘Y’ class citIes would be admissible for transfers within ‘X’ and ‘Y class cities; ‘X’ to‘Y’ class cities and vice-versa; and from ‘X’/’Y’ class cities to ‘Z’ class cities and vice-versa. In all other cases of transfers within ‘Z’ class cities, the rates prescribed for ‘Z’ class cities shall be admissible.
(Authority: Railway Board’s letter No. F(E)I/2008/AL-28/15 dated 08.03.2011)

Note-2: The rates of transportation of personal effects as mentioned above shall automatically increase by 25% whenever Dearness Allowance payable on the revised pay structure goes up by 50%.

(4) Add sub-rule B(3) below Rule 1643 (B) (2):
1643 (B) (3): The rates of transportation of personal effects by road between places connected by rail/not connected by rail would be the rates as prescribed in the table In Rule 1643 (B) (2).

(Authority: Railway Board’s letters No. F(E)I/2008/AL-28/15 dated 29.12.2010 & No. F(E)I/2011/AL-28/26 dated 01.09.2011 & 14.02.2012)

(5) The following may be added below existing Rule 1643(C):

Transportation of Conveyance on Transfer/settlement after retirement:

WHEN CONVEYANCE IS SENT UNDER ITS OWN PROPULSION
Between places connected by railBetween places not connected by rail
Prescribed rates limited to expenditure on transportation
by passenger train on rail.
Prescribed rates.*

WHEN CONVEYANCE IS SENT LOADED ON A TRUCK 

Between places connected by railBetween places not connected by rail
Actual expenses limited to prescribed rates or
expenditure on transportation by passenger train on rail, whichever less.
Actual expenses limited to  prescribed rates.*

*Prescribed rates means, the rates notified by the concerned Directorate of Transport, for taxi and auto rickshaw, at the starting point, subject to a maximum of Rs.201- for taxi and Rs.10/- for auto rickshaw as prescribed/revised from time to time.

(Authority: Railway Board’s letter No.F(E)I/2011/AL-28/26 dated 01.09.2011)

(6) Rule 1643 (D)(II) (a) Item No.(ii) of the table under Rule 1643 (D) (II)(a) stands deleted.

(7) Note. 1 below Rule 1643 (D)(II)(a) stands deleted.

(8) Rule 1643 (D)(II)(b) 

In the last line of Rule 1643 (D) (II) (b) delete the words “irrespective of his date of joining Railway service i.e. before, on or after 1.5.76”.

(9) RuIe 1643 (D)(III)(vi) stands deleted.

(10) Rule 1643 (D)(IV) Quantum of Advance.

Substitute Rule 1643 (D) IV (i) & (ii) with the following:

“The quantum of advance admissible on transfer to a serving Railway employee is 75% of the admissible amount of Composite Transfer Grant.”

(11) Below Rule 1643 (D)(V) under Railway Ministry’s Decisions, the following may be substituted in lieu of the existing decision.

Transfer Travelling Allowance in cases, where both husband and wife are in Government service and are transferred within 60 days of his/her transfer from the same place to the same place, shall not be admissible to the spouse transferred later. In cases where the transfer takes place within six months, but after 60 days of the transfer of the spouse, fifty per cent of the Transfer Grant on transfer shall be allowed to the spouse transferred later. No transfer grant shall be admissible to the spouse transferred later, in case both the transfers are ordered within 60 days. The existing provisions shall continue to be applicable in case of transfer after a period of six months or more. Other rules precluding Transfer Grant in case of transfer at own request or transfer other than in public interest shall continue to apply unchanged in theIr case.

(Authority: Railway Board’s letter No. F(E)I/2008/AL-28/15 dated 01.12.2008)

(12) Rule 1644(1) stands deleted.

(13) Rule 1644(2) and Note below Rule 1644(2) stands deleted.

(14) In Rule 1644 (3), substitute the words “Transfer Grant and Packing Allowance” with “Composite Transfer Grant”.

(15) Rule 1644(4) stands deleted.

(16) Rule 1645 1(b) stands deleted.

(17) The following may be substituted in lieu of Note (i) below Rule 1645-I-(c)
NOTE (i) A Railway servant who has been transferred within the same station or to an outstation within 20 Kms. of the old headquarters, shall be granted Composite Transfer Grant at the rate of one-third of one month’s basic pay, provided there s a change of residence, as a result of transfer.

(18) Rule 1645 II (b) may be substituted with the following in lieu of the existing rule:
(b) If there is a change of residence as a result of transfer, full transfer travelling allowance will be admissible if the distance between the two stations exceeds 20 Kms.

Section XXI - Journeys on a course of training

The existing sub-rule (2) of Rule 1686 may be substituted by:

“The apprentices (whether mechanical or other categories) who are in receipt of the concession of free boarding and lodging at their headquarters may be allowed Travelling Allowance applicable to the category to which they are apprentices provided they are required to undertake such journeys as a part of their training and no free boarding is arranged for them.”
(Authority: Board’s letter No. F(E)I/89/AL-2818 dated 2.11.89)



Monday, 17 June 2013

Postmaster Grade I Examination 2013- Vacancy Position


The circle wise vacancy position of Postmaster Grade I Examination 2013 scheduled to be held on 30.06.2013 as communicated vide Directorate letter no A-34012/4/2012-DE dated 10.06.2013 is as follows.

CBI raid in post office fraud

ROURKELA: A CBI team raided houses of a post master and a Class IV postal employee here on Friday in connection with the alleged embezzlement of funds from account holders of Dumdapara sub-post office under Biramitrapur post office. The CBI officials refused to divulge details regarding the raid.
According to sources, a couple of account holders of the sub-post office in December, 2012, found that they had no money in their accounts even though their passbooks suggested otherwise. Following complaint of some customers, a departmental inquiry was initiated against post master Pradeep Lakra and Class IV employee Ram Dayal Sharma. They were transferred to elsewhere. During inquiry, it was revealed that deposited amount of many account holders was withdrawn through fake signatures. Later, the duo was suspended and CBI took over the case.

Government may ban NBFCs from running deposit schemes to protect investors

NEW DELHI: The government is considering banning non-financial companies from running deposit schemes as part of a move to strengthen the financial sector and protect millions of low-income investors who often get duped into buying unlicensed products promising unrealistic returns. 

"It is being discussed if outright banning of such companies can be easily implemented," a senior official, who did not wish to be named, said, referring to regulations being deliberated upon by an inter-ministerial group. 

Ponzi schemes have existed in India for years, largely because of the gaps in its financial sector regulations. In April, the problem surfaced again when an unlicensed financial scheme run by Bengal-based Saradha Group went bust, sinking the money of millions of investors, most of who were outside the banking system. 

Curbing sale of such financial products, which target lower- and middle-income groups and invest mainly in real estate and plantation, is difficult as the companies that run them fall outside the regulatory radar. "Atpresent, they do not fall under the supervision of the RBI (central bank) or Sebi (market regulator), making it difficult to curb their activities," the official said. 

The inter-ministerial panel is also considering creation of a central coordination agency toshare market intelligence between the central and state governments for better regulation ofnon-banking finance companies (NBFCs), multi-level marketing entities and companies running collective investment schemes. 

"Such a co-ordinating agency will provide the platform where the regulators, central government and state governments can share and analyse data," the official said. 

The issue of ponzi schemes has been highlighted by finance minister P Chidambaram. Earlier, a parliamentary panel, headed by former finance minister Yashwant Sinha, had suggested a blanket ban on such schemes and creation of a regulator to oversee their functioning or scrapping them altogether. 

The inter-ministerial group, set up after the Saradha Group scam, has representation from the revenue and economic affairs department in finance ministry, ministry of corporate affairs, banking sector regulator RBI and Sebi. 

To strengthen the existing mechanism, the RBI will also look at resetting the criteria for registration of NBFCs. "The RBI will also hold internal discussions ON WHETHER the principal business criteria for NBFCs should be the main part of the Act and not in subordinate legislations, which can be changed at a later stage," the official said. 

The inter-ministerial group has also roped in the department of information technology to help regulate online deposit schemes. 

"The overall strategy is to provide a quick and efficient redressal mechanism for investors who are duped by unincorporated bodies (UIBs), or unauthorised entities collecting deposits," the official said. The central government will also push all states to enact laws to protect the interest of depositors in financial establishments. 

According to the official, the inter-ministerial group will not take up the issue of multi-level marketing companies, and companies such as Amway. 

"The department of consumer affairs is already looking into the issue."

Com. Giriraj Singh, GS, R - III & others hospitalized

While returning from Gonda after attending Open Session of R - III U P Circle Conference , Com. Giriraj Singh, Genl. Secy. R – III, Com. R N Parasar, Com. Virender Tiwari, Com. V K Shaha met an accident in between Barabanki and Faizabadat 9.45 PM on 16.06.2013 and got admitted to Metro and Troma Hospital at 11.45 PM and now under treatment. Com. Subhas Mishra, C S, P – III, U P Circle  has moved to the hospital and all are recovering.
The AIPEU, Group-C, Bhubaneswar Division wishes all an early recovery

Launch of Logistics Post Air Service

India Post has started “Logistics Post Air Service in Association with Air India on identified sectors amontst 15 linking airports, Agartala, Delhi, Mumbai, Kolkata, Nagpur, Bangalore, Hyderabad, Chennai, Pune, Ahmedabad, Imphal, Guwahati, Patna, Lucknow & Trivandrum (Thiruvananthapuram). The main  features of this service include.

(i)            First Category: Airport. Customer to deposit the consignment at the postal facility available at the airport premises at Logistics Post Air Booking Centre, Palam TMO, New Delhi – 110037 and the deliverywill be effected to the customer at the post office facility at the destination airport.
(ii)          Second Category: City to City (on payment of additional charges). On payment of City to City charges, the consignment will be booked at Logistics Post Air Booking Centre, RMS Bhawan, Delhi -  110006 and the delivery will be effected at the Logistics Post Delivery Centres in the Destination city. (Minimum additional charges Rs 50 per consignment @ Rs. 1/- kg).
(iii)         Third Category: Door to Door (on payment of additional charges). Pick up from the premises or delivery at the permises of the consignment (Minimum additional charges Rs. 100 per consignment @ Rs. 2/- per kg).

Charges shall be as per volumetric weight rates to be followed inaccordance with IATA standards (6000 cubic cm = 1 kg for the purpose). There will be four types of rates for Logistics Post Air Service viz.

(i)            Standard rate            -           For consignment upto 49 kgs.
(ii)          Bulk Rate (BA)         -           for 50 kgs to 99 kgs.
(iii)         Bulk Rate (BB)         -           For 100 kgs to 249 kgs.
(iv)         Bulk Rate (BC)         -           For 250 kgs & above

Source : PIB

IP (Departmental) Induction Training at PTC, Darbhanga w.e.f 11.07.2013 to 08.10.2013


WB Circle memo No WBV/Trg Cell/IPO Induction.2012 dated 17.06.2013.

Sunday, 16 June 2013

No plan to increase Central Govt Employees’ Retirement age: Zee News


A hot news is coming from Zee News that DoPT has not been working on any proposal to increase the retirement age to 62 from 60 years for Central Government Employees.  A senior official from DoPT has confirmed the above news to media and also clarified that  a committee has been formed for increase the retirement age of specialists in scientific and medical fields (scientists) to 64 years.  Last updates from parliament question session is also indicating that there is no proposal under consideration in this regard.  


The news article of Zee News, which is showing updation time of 13.28 of 16th June, it means it is very latest news in this regard, the text of the said news is reproduced below:-

New Delhi: Central government employees are in for a disappointment as the Centre is at present not considering any move to raise the retirement age to 62 years. 

A senior official in the Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions, which acts as nodal department for personnel matters, said there was no such proposal to increase the age for superannuation of government employees. 

"There is no proposal to increase the retirement age to 62 from 60 years. The Ministry is not working on any such proposal," the official said. 




Recent media reports claimed that the Ministry has written to Prime Minister's Office for raising the retirement age and sought the Union Cabinet's nod for the purpose.

There are about 50 lakh central government employees working in various departments across the country. 

Officials in the Ministry said increasing retirement age requires a detailed consultation with all stake holders and discussion with the Finance Ministry. 

Without the Finance Ministry's permission, the matter cannot not be processed, they said. 

At a time when government is working on austerity drive by cutting expenditure and putting in efforts to rein in current account deficit (CAD), the move to increase retirement age will also burden the exchequer's kitty, they said. 

The CAD, which is the difference between the inflow and outflow of foreign currency, had touched a record high of 6.7 per cent in the October-December quarter of 2012-13 on the back of rising oil and gold imports.

The retirement age for a majority of central government employees is 60 years. However, the age for retirement in case of teachers and scientists is 62 years. 

The age of superannuation in states like Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh and Assam is also 60 years. 

In a related development, the government has decided to further increase the retirement age of specialists in scientific and medical fields (scientists) to 64 years. 

"A Committee has been formed under the chairmanship of Cabinet Secretary by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh for the purpose," said another Personnel Ministry official. 

read more at Zee News

 Via : http://karnmk.blogspot.in/

No plan to increase retirement age of employees"- PTI Report


"No plan to increase retirement age of employees"- PTI Report

New Delhi, Jun 16 (PTI) Central government employees are in for a disappointment as the Centre is at present not considering any move to raise the retirement age to 62 years.

A senior official in the Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions, which acts as nodal department for personnel matters, said there was no such proposal to increase the age for superannuation of government employees.


"There is no proposal to increase the retirement age to 62 from 60 years".

Source: PTI News
[http://www.ptinews.com/news/3724917_-No-plan-to-increase-retirement-age-of-employees-]

The world of the Telegram



When the doorbell rang in the middle of the night, the 'who could it be at this hour' question ran through everyone's mind. If the voice on the other side of the door said 'telegram' then the curiosity intensified into an electric form of anxiety that raced through the house bringing everyone within earshot to the door. One signed for the sealed envelope, ripped it open and read out the contents, all hearts clogging up one mouth. Sometimes the news was exactly of the kind that made telegrams so feared while on other occasions, telegram said something to the effect  of 'Arriving 17th instant Rajdhani with family. Book return 6th May." Of course, one had the more harmless greetings telegrams (number 5 Many Happy Returns of the Day) but those were unlikely to be delivered in the dead of night. By virtue of their speed and stealth, telegrams were messengers of fate, letter bombs that  interrupted the placid predictability of life with some sudden and significant new development. 

For a technology that now seems rudimentary at best, the telegraph was in fact a truly radical and discontinuous innovation that marked the beginning of the Information Age. Noam Chomsky argues that the shift from sailing ship to telegraph was more radical than from the telephone to the e-mail and it is easy to see why. The telegraph made it possible not only to compress meaning into some rudimentary sound signals that could be sent and received  over vast distances but do so wirelessly and in real time. The Morse code allowed the telegraph to move beyond more basic signals into the fullness of language and radio technology freed it from wires. The collapsing of distance that we see as a fundamental attribute of technology today was first made evident in the telegraph which made it possible for different parts of the world to have the same experience at the same time. The ability to unite the world around a moment is a powerful experience that makes our parallel existences palpably simultaneous. 

At a time when other modes of communication were unreliable, inaccessible and slow, the telegram was the final recourse available when a message just had to be delivered with a guarantee. In its manner of use, respect for its importance was usually maintained; the telegram was never just another way of reaching someone. The expensiveness of the telegram meant that for most normal people, language would need to rid itself of its finery and communicate in guttural droppings of meaning. Articles, prepositions, conjunctions, were among the casualties of this mode of communication, as words huddled together without the relief of semantic cushions to create hard bits of meaning. Other modes of reaching were far more adept at more leisurely interactions. The telegram delivered the promise of technology without any of its gloss, it murdered distance, but did so without any great finesse. There was clearly a trade-off to be made between speed and the richness of communication which is why the telegram worked best when it was conveying a piece of news with some finality- someone passed the exam, someone else passed away, a trip date got postponed.

In some ways, the telegram in the laconic abruptness of its form, emphasised the fact that the dominant meaning of communication at that time was very different.  In that world, relationships were lavished with time, attention and conversation. Postcards and inland letters were deemed to be wasted if every inch on its sides were not filled up with crawling postscripts of sundry kinds. Distance made the urge to stay connected that much deeper, and the fact that typically no message could be exchanged in a time period less than a fortnight at the least, given the slowness of the postal system, meant that we derived disproportionate communication from relatively infrequent contact. Vacations became a time when relationships were tanked up with a couple of months' worth of interaction, which was lived off for the rest of the year, topped up by periodic postcards and letters, which were read aloud and then re-read several times. A trunk call was rare-  the difficulty of getting through (particularly because often, it involving one party calling from a Post Office and the other using the neighbour's phone) and the cost involved pretty much ensured that. In any case, when the need was to urgently communicate some bit of information, nothing could beat the telegram. 

Unlike the idea of always being connected that has become the norm today- everyone meaningful is either on social media or a text message away- we lived a life only partially illuminated with knowledge. At any given point in time, there were so many aspects of our own life that we had no access to. When someone went abroad, for instance, for long periods of time, one's loved ones had no idea as to what was happening. Any meaningful form of communication was slow, so slow that by the time one received and replied, things could have changed dramatically. Relationships found a way of thriving in this constrained world by substituting imagination and yearning in the place of actual contact. The telegram was a way of ensuring that if it came to the crunch,  virtually instant communication was always possible. Armed with this lifeline, the idea of connectivity focused on richness rather than frequency. Every physical contact was heightened by the anticipation that preceded it and the wallowing in memories that followed it. By itself, the telegram is hardly a great loss, but it does also tell us that the world that depended on it has also changed in a fundamental way. That we don't need the telegram any more is a clue to the fact that we are connected all the time, but it may also point out that being connected is not the same as feeling a connection.

Source:-The Times of India

HOMAGE TO COM. ADINARAYANA



Minutes of the meeting held on 28.5.2013 with the representatives of Staff Side, National Council (JCM) on pensionary matters - AIRF


F. No. 42/7/2013-P&PW(G)
Government of India
Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances & Pensions
Department of Pension & Pensioners’ Welfare

3rd Floor, Lok Nayak Bhavan,
Khan Market, New Delhi - 110003
Dated : 12th June, 2013

OFFICE MEMORANDUM

Subject: Minutes of the meeting held on 28.5.2013 with the representatives of Staff Side, National Council (JCM) on pensionary matters.

The undersigned is directed to enclose herewith a copy of minutes of the meeting held on 28.5.2013 with the representatives of the Staff Side, National Council (JCM) on pensionary matters under the Chairmanship of Secretary (Pension, AR&PG) in room No. 310, Lok Nayak Bhawan, Khan Market, New Delhi for information/necessary action.

sd/-
(Sujasha Choudhury)
Dy. Secretary (P)

DEPARTMENT OF PENSION & PENSIONERS’ WELFARE

MINUTES OF THE MEETING WITH THE REPRESENTATIVES OF STAFF SIDE, NATIONAL COUNCIL (JCM) ON PENSIONARY MATTERS UNDER THE CHAIRMANSHIP OF SECRETARY (PENSION, AR&PG) ON 28.5.2013 AT LOK NAYAK BHAWAN, NEW DELHI

Secretary (Pension, AR&PG) chaired a meeting with the representatives of Staff Side, National Council (JCM) on 28.5.2013 to discuss various issues relating to pension and other retirement benefits. The list of participants is at Annexure - I. Secretary (Pension, AR&PG) welcomed the participants and appreciated the contributions of the pensioners in the overall development of their respective organisation.

2. The meeting started with a discussion on the Action Taken Report on the minutes of the meeting held on 6.11.2012 as per details given below :

(i) Ex-gratia payment to SRPF/CPF beneficiaries who retired other than on superannuation, i.e. voluntary retirement and medical invalidation cases.

Department of Expenditure has given clearance for deletion of clause of 'c' of para 2 of OM dated 22.3.2004 which prohibits grant of ex-gratia payment to those, who retired from service other than on attaining the prescribed age of superannuation. With this, CPF beneficiaries who have retired voluntarily and on medical grounds after 20 years of service will also be granted ex-gratia. It was decided that this agenda item will be closed after issue of a revised OM by the DOP&PW. Ministry of Railways will also issue similar orders.
Action DOP&PW and Ministry of Railways

(ii) Raising quantum of ex-gratia to CPF retirees on the lines of SRPF.

The latest status of the case was intimated to the JCM. After the issue of orders by this Department, consequent to the decision of Cabinet the item may be dropped.
Action : DOP&PW

(iii) Abnormal delay in the issue of revised PPO to Pre - 2006 retirees, pensioners / family pensioners.

(i) It was intimated that the Department had taken the following initiatives like (a) allowing change in date of birth of spouse, (b) use of certain documents as proof of date of birth of spouse, (c) inclusion of present postal address and mobile and telephone number in the life certificate (d) use of e-scroll for extracting information from banks’ database. (e) revision of PPOs even in cases where date of birth/age of spouse is not given in the PPO or this information is not available In the omce records for speedy revision of PPOs.

(ii) As a result, the number of pending revision cases for civil pensioners has come down from 2,54,467 in August, 2012 to 74,000 as on April, 2013 as per information given by the CPAO on the basis of e-scrolls.

(iii) However, amendment in calculation of revised pension, vIde OM dated 28.1.13, has necessitated issue of revised authority in all cases, as indicated in OM dated 13.2.13.

Secretary (Pension, AR&PG) stated that record/information of many pensioners are not available with the Departments, which is hampering further progress and the Pensioners Associations should come forward to help the departments in reaching out to the pensioners/family pensioners. He further stated that Secretaries of various Departments have been requested to review the issue of revision of PPO in the fortnightly/ monthly meetings.

Railways stated that in case of pre 2006 pensioners advertisement has been issued. Matter was taken up with RBI to issue notification to all banks. Out of 10.89 lakh such cases, 5.46 have been issued revised PPOs. Meetings ere generally held at various levels. 30th September, 2013 has been set as the target date for disposal of these cases. The progress is being reviewed every month. It has also been decided to take up the revision of PPOs suo-moto rather than waiting for an application from the pensioner. The said letter is under issue. Secretary (Pension, AR&PG) desired that the same may be issued by 15th June, 2013.Secretary, Pension des,red that necessary chances in systems may be made if that would facilitate the pension sanction and payment processes in the Raliways. The present pension authorisaton is decentralised In the Railways. Secretary, Pension also stated that he will write to the Chairman, Railway Board in this matter.

CGDA, Ministry of Defence intimated that they hope to complete the exercise by 30th September, 2013.
Action : CPAO, Ministry of Railways, 
Ministry of Defence & DOP&PW

(iv) Fixation of Revised Pension (1/3rd of commuted portion of pension) in respect of Government servant who had drawn lump sum payment on absorption - revision by multiplying pre revised 1/3rd pension by a factor of 2.26.

CAT, Hyderabad Bench, vide its order dated 22.4.2013, has directed, to pass an order for revision of pension of absorbee pensioner’s. The Staff Side was informed that the matter was under examination in consultation with Department of Expenditure.

(V) Commutation of Pension

(a) Revision of old / new commutation table and

(b) Restoration of commutation period to be reduced from 15 to 12 years. 

It was explained that the matter of revision of old/new commutation table was discussed with Department of Expenditure. It was observed that this issue should be considered by the next pay commission.

JCM intimated that by the new commutation table, the restoration of the commuted portion is completed by 11 years because interest rate is at 8% unlike the old table wherein the restoration period was after 15 years because interest rate was taken at 4.75%. Department of Expenditure stated that issue for this old/new commutation table can be studied only by a specialised body and hence could be looked into by the IRDA. However, these are larger issues for which a holistic view needs tobe taken by a body like the Pay Commission. However, the matter may be referred to Department of Expenditure.

(vi) Family pension to divorced/Widowed/Unmarried daughter of a Government Servant. 

Difficulty faced by them in getting family pension sanctioned.

Life Time Arrear.
JCM did not raise any specific point in this regard. In fact, it was mentioned by the JCM members that the legal view on the issue of nomination of life time arrear of family pension is that since he/she has not earned the family pension he/she also can not have the right to nominate. As such, the matter may be dropped.

(vii) Payment of arrears of pension/family pension on account of revision of pension/family pension with effect from 1.1.2006.

Specific case of bank In Chandrapur.

It was informed that the matter was taken up with CPPC, Mumbal (SBI), who informed that the payment to pensioners is being made and there is no such case where pension has not been revised as per 6th CPC. Hence the matter may be dropped.

(viii) Payment of Pension to the spouse of pensioners through S.B. account opened jointly with spouse

- Problem in SBI.

CPAO has informed that necessary instructions in this regard have been issued to all CPPCs with the direction to bring the contents to the notice of all paying branches. CPAO was requested to give a copy to the JCM. It was decided to drop the matter.

3. The representatives of JCM also desired the status of eight agenda items sent by Shri Shiva Gopal Mishra, General Secretary, AIRE which were not included may also be intimated clearly. This may be informed to him separately.

4. After above discussion on Action Taken Report on the minutes of meeting dated 6.11.2012, fresh agenda items were taken for discussion which are as under

(i) Equitable Gratuity under Rule 50 of Pension Rules. Slabs are too wide leading to disparity.

Rule 50 of Pension Rus provide the following death gratuity to the family of the deceased Government servant.
SI.No.Length of serviceRate of death gratuity
1Less than one year2 times of emoluments
2One year or more but less than 5 years.6 times of emoluments.
35 years or more but less than 20 years.12 times of emoluments.
420 years or more.Half month of emoluments for every completed six monthly period of qualifying service subject to a maximum of 33 times of emoluments.

The JCM (Staff Side) has stated that the slab given at SI. No. 3 above is not equitable and suggested the following revision 

3(i)5 years or more but less than 11 years12 times of emoluments.
3(ii)11 years or more but less than 20 years20 times of emoluments.

This issue was discussed in the JCM meeting. The present slab of death gratuity was introduced w.e.f. from 1.1.1986 and was introduced as per the recommendations of 4th Central Pay Commission, vide this Department’s OM No. 2/1/1987-PIC-II dated 14.4.1987, This slab has not been revised since 1986. In between, the 5th and 6th Pay Commission had submitted their reports but no revision had been recommended. After discussions, it was decided that the matter may be examined in consultation with Department of Expenditure.
Action: DOP&PW

(ii) Extension of CS (MA) Rules, 1944 to Central Government Pensioners residing in non-CGHS areas.
The Staff Side demanded that as in the case of serving employees, the CS (MA) Rules may be extended to the pensioners also. This would make pensioners in the non CGHS areas entitled for reimbursement of medical expenses. Staff Side also mentioned that Honble Supreme Court has dismissed some SLPs and allowed reimbursement of medical examination of pensioners, in accordance with CS (MA) Rules.

The representative from Ministry of Health informed that the proposal for extension of CS (MA) Rules 1944 to Central Government pensioners was not agreed to in view of huge financial impliations. In regard to the dismissal oF SLP flied by Department against order of courts/tribunals for grant of medical benefits irn individual cases, Ministry of Health has flied a review petition in Supreme Court. It was also informed that Ministry of Health is contemplating Health Insurance Scheme on pan India basis keeping special focus on the non CHGS areas. This Is expected to solve the problems of pensioner’s living in non CGHS areas. The item was treated as closed.

(iii) Grant of modified parity with reference to the Revised Pay Scale corresponding to pre revised Pay Scale of the post from which an employee had retired — upgraded pay scale Instead of normal replacement scales.

The JCM suggested that upgraded revised pay scales may be notionally extended and used for pension fixation instead of normal replacement scales.

It was informed that after the 5th Pay Commission also modified parity was allowed with reference to replacement pay scales and not with the upgraded pay scales. This decision of Government was also upheld by Supreme Court in its judgement dated 23.11.2006 in the CA No. 3173-3174/2006 & 3188-3190/2006 (K. S. Krishna Swamy Vs. UOI). In the 6th CPC the same principle has been followed in view of the above. It was informed that it would not be possible to reopen this issue.Therefore, the Ítem may be closed.

5. The meeting ended with a vote of thanks to the chair.

Source: AIRF
[http://www.airfindia.com/DOPT/Minutes%20of%20Pensionary%20Benefit%20Meeting_12.06.2013.pdf]